|
|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey |
| Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4245 | December 2000 |
|
Suspended-solids transport during dredging PCB concentration changes during dredging PCB loading in the Fox River due to the dredging operation PCB transport back into the river from the onshore-processing operation Postdredging PCB concentration and loads Adjusting water-column PCB concentrations to allow comparison with onshore-sample PCB data Lessons learned |
A Mass-Balance Approach for Assessing PCB Movement During Remediation of a PCB-Contaminated Deposit on the Fox River, Wisconsin |
|
Lessons learnedCommonly used techniques such as measurement of total suspended solids (TSS) and turbidity were inadequate to describe transport of PCBs during a dredging operation in the Fox River. Little or no measurable difference was found between the upstream and downstream TSS concentrations (or loads) over the length of the operation. However, neither turbidity nor TSS was sufficient to predict PCB transport because of increased PCB concentration on a particle and dissolved-phase PCB concentration. Approximately 35 percent of the PCB load at the downstream site was in the dissolved phase. Results of the study described here indicate that if chemical transport is to be quantified during a PCB remediation, then monitoring of TSS and turbidity alone is not adequate. The study illustrates the importance of collecting water-column samples at numerous vertical and lateral locations to represent an entire transect concentration. The study found lateral concentration differences that would skew a sample if the entire cross-section was not adequately sampled. Additionally, in a dynamic situation (dredging operation), even in a large river, sampling over a prolonged interval is necessary to obtain a representative daily concentration of a constituent of interest.
In summary, hydraulic dredging, by means of a horizontal auger cutter head and permeable silt curtain, resulted in a net PCB load (Aroclor 1242) of 14.5 kg to the water column in the Fox River while 654 kg were permanently removed from the deposit. At the same time, less than 0.15 kg was discharged back to the water column from the onshore processing (fig. 1). This is compared to an annual load (congener summation) (199495) of 186 kg from the Fox River into Green Bay.
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S.
Geological Survey |